http://www.markmwhelan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M-remove.png00Mark M Whelanhttp://www.markmwhelan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M-remove.pngMark M Whelan2022-12-17 18:07:342022-12-17 18:07:35What is a futurist?
http://www.markmwhelan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M-remove.png00Mark M Whelanhttp://www.markmwhelan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M-remove.pngMark M Whelan2022-12-17 12:39:082022-12-17 12:39:57Quantum cryptography
http://www.markmwhelan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M-remove.png00Mark M Whelanhttp://www.markmwhelan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M-remove.pngMark M Whelan2022-12-17 12:36:452022-12-17 12:36:47Is the Singularity coming?
http://www.markmwhelan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M-remove.png00Mark M Whelanhttp://www.markmwhelan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M-remove.pngMark M Whelan2022-12-17 06:21:252022-12-17 06:21:27Difference of Opinion in Quantum Mechanics
http://www.markmwhelan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M-remove.png00Mark M Whelanhttp://www.markmwhelan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M-remove.pngMark M Whelan2022-12-17 06:09:362022-12-17 06:12:21Quantum Entanglement
http://www.markmwhelan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M-remove.png00Mark M Whelanhttp://www.markmwhelan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M-remove.pngMark M Whelan2022-12-17 05:49:052022-12-17 05:54:30What is Schrödinger's cat anyway?
“Unlocking the mysteries of the universe: Einstein and Bohr’s Variables and the quest to understand the world around us” by Mark M. Whelan
Einstein and Bohr differed in their views on the concept of hidden variables in quantum mechanics.
In the early 20th century, the Danish physicist Niels Bohr developed the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, which is a framework for understanding the behavior of quantum systems. According to the Copenhagen interpretation, the state of a quantum system is described by a wave function, which represents the probability of finding a particle in a particular state. The act of observation, or measurement, causes the wave function to collapse, determining the state of the system.
Albert Einstein, however, was not satisfied with the Copenhagen interpretation and believed that it was incomplete. He argued that the concept of wave function collapse was not a fundamental aspect of quantum mechanics and that there must be some underlying “hidden variables” that determine the state of a quantum system. Einstein believed that these hidden variables could be used to explain the behavior of quantum systems in a more deterministic and predictable way.
Bohr and Einstein had a famous series of debates over the concept of hidden variables, and their disagreement became known as the “EPR paradox,” named after Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, who published a paper on the topic in 1935. Despite Einstein’s efforts to prove the existence of hidden variables, the majority of the scientific community has accepted the Copenhagen interpretation as the most accurate and complete description of quantum mechanics.
http://www.markmwhelan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M-remove.png00markmwhelanhttp://www.markmwhelan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M-remove.pngmarkmwhelan2022-12-17 00:00:002022-12-17 00:00:00“Unlocking the mysteries of the universe: Einstein and Bohr’s Variables and the quest to understand the world around us” by Mark M. Whelan
“The Future is Now: The Case for Augmented Reality in 2023 and How it’s Transforming Our World” by Mark M. Whelan
The Case for Augmented Reality in 202
Augmented reality (AR) glasses are wearable devices that allow users to see and interact with virtual objects and information in the real world. AR glasses have the potential to revolutionize a wide range of industries and applications, both in the consumer and enterprise sectors. Here are a few potential novel use cases for AR glasses:
Education and training: AR glasses could be used to provide immersive learning experiences and simulations for students and professionals. For example, a student could use AR glasses to see and interact with virtual models of historical events or scientific concepts. A surgeon could use AR glasses to practice procedures or receive real-time guidance during surgery.
Retail and marketing: AR glasses could be used to enhance the shopping experience for consumers. For example, a customer could use AR glasses to visualize how a piece of furniture would look in their home before making a purchase. Retailers could also use AR glasses to create interactive marketing campaigns that engage customers in new and innovative ways.
Manufacturing and logistics: AR glasses could be used to improve efficiency and accuracy in manufacturing and logistics operations. For example, an assembly line worker could use AR glasses to receive real-time instructions and feedback, or to access technical diagrams and manuals. A warehouse worker could use AR glasses to locate and identify specific items more quickly.
Healthcare: AR glasses could be used to assist healthcare professionals in a variety of ways. For example, a doctor could use AR glasses to access patient records and diagnostic images while examining a patient or to receive real-time guidance during a procedure. AR glasses could also be used to help patients visualize and understand medical information and treatment options.
Entertainment: AR glasses could be used to create new and immersive entertainment experiences. For example, a user could use AR glasses to play interactive games that blend virtual and real-world elements or to watch movies and TV shows with enhanced visual effects.
These are just a few examples of the potential uses for AR glasses in both the consumer and enterprise sectors. As technology continues to advance, it is likely that we will see even more novel and innovative uses for AR glasses in the future.
http://www.markmwhelan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M-remove.png00markmwhelanhttp://www.markmwhelan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M-remove.pngmarkmwhelan2022-12-17 00:00:002022-12-17 00:00:00“The Future is Now: The Case for Augmented Reality in 2023 and How it’s Transforming Our World” by Mark M. Whelan
“The Simulation Hypothesis: Are We Living in a Computer Simulation? A Thought-provoking Exploration of the Simulation Argument” by Mark Whelan
The Simulation argument, proposed by philosopher Nick Bostrom in 2003, is a thought experiment that suggests that it is possible that our reality is actually a computer simulation. According to Bostrom, one of the following three statements must be true:
Almost all civilizations at our level of technological development go extinct before they are able to create a “posthuman” civilization capable of creating ancestor simulations.
A posthuman civilization is not interested in creating ancestor simulations.
We are almost certainly living in a computer simulation.
Bostrom’s argument is based on the idea that, as technology advances, it will become increasingly possible to create realistic virtual worlds that are indistinguishable from reality. If a posthuman civilization were to create a large number of ancestor simulations, it is likely that the vast majority of minds that have ever existed would be simulated rather than “real.” In this case, the probability that we are living in a simulated reality would be close to 1.
The Simulation argument has generated a significant amount of discussion and debate within the philosophical and scientific communities. Some argue that the argument relies on certain assumptions that may not be true, such as the assumption that a posthuman civilization would be interested in creating ancestor simulations. Others argue that the argument raises important questions about the nature of reality and the limits of human knowledge.
Overall, the Simulation argument is a thought-provoking idea that challenges our assumptions about the nature of reality and highlights the limits of our understanding of the universe. However, it is important to recognize that the argument is purely speculative and has not been proven to be true or false.
http://www.markmwhelan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M-remove.png00markmwhelanhttp://www.markmwhelan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M-remove.pngmarkmwhelan2022-12-17 00:00:002022-12-17 00:00:00“The Simulation Hypothesis: Are We Living in a Computer Simulation? A Thought-provoking Exploration of the Simulation Argument” by Mark Whelan
“The Quantum Connection: Exploring the Phenomenon of Entanglement and its Impact on Our Understanding of the Universe” by Mark M. Whelan
In quantum mechanics, two particles can become “entangled,” meaning that they exhibit a type of correlation that cannot be explained by classical physics. When two particles are entangled, their properties, such as their spin or polarization, become interconnected, even if the particles are separated by large distances. This phenomenon is known as “non-local” behavior.
To understand how entangled quantum states work, it is helpful to consider an example. Suppose that two particles, called particles A and B, are entangled and separated by a large distance. If the spin of particle A is measured, it will have a certain value, such as “up” or “down.” At the same time, the spin of particle B will also be determined, even though it is not directly measured. In other words, the state of particle A is “linked” to the state of particle B, and measuring one particle instantaneously determines the state of the other particle. This is known as the “instantaneous collapse of the wave function.”
Entangled quantum states are a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics and have a wide range of potential applications, including quantum computing and communication, as well as basic scientific research. However, the concept of entangled quantum states is still not fully understood and continues to be the subject of much research and debate in the scientific community.
http://www.markmwhelan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M-remove.png00markmwhelanhttp://www.markmwhelan.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/M-remove.pngmarkmwhelan2022-12-17 00:00:002022-12-17 00:00:00“The Quantum Connection: Exploring the Phenomenon of Entanglement and its Impact on Our Understanding of the Universe” by Mark M. Whelan
What is a futurist?
/0 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Mark M WhelanQuantum cryptography
/0 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Mark M WhelanIs the Singularity coming?
/0 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Mark M WhelanDifference of Opinion in Quantum Mechanics
/0 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Mark M WhelanQuantum Entanglement
/0 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Mark M WhelanWhat is Schrödinger’s cat anyway?
/0 Comments/in Uncategorized /by Mark M Whelan“Unlocking the mysteries of the universe: Einstein and Bohr’s Variables and the quest to understand the world around us” by Mark M. Whelan
/0 Comments/in Uncategorized /by markmwhelan“Unlocking the mysteries of the universe: Einstein and Bohr’s Variables and the quest to understand the world around us” by Mark M. Whelan
Einstein and Bohr differed in their views on the concept of hidden variables in quantum mechanics.
In the early 20th century, the Danish physicist Niels Bohr developed the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, which is a framework for understanding the behavior of quantum systems. According to the Copenhagen interpretation, the state of a quantum system is described by a wave function, which represents the probability of finding a particle in a particular state. The act of observation, or measurement, causes the wave function to collapse, determining the state of the system.
Albert Einstein, however, was not satisfied with the Copenhagen interpretation and believed that it was incomplete. He argued that the concept of wave function collapse was not a fundamental aspect of quantum mechanics and that there must be some underlying “hidden variables” that determine the state of a quantum system. Einstein believed that these hidden variables could be used to explain the behavior of quantum systems in a more deterministic and predictable way.
Bohr and Einstein had a famous series of debates over the concept of hidden variables, and their disagreement became known as the “EPR paradox,” named after Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, who published a paper on the topic in 1935. Despite Einstein’s efforts to prove the existence of hidden variables, the majority of the scientific community has accepted the Copenhagen interpretation as the most accurate and complete description of quantum mechanics.
To learn more about emerging trends by Mark M. Whelan or his artwork.
Visit Future Center Ventures
Or my new book available on Amazon and Apple.
“The Future is Now: The Case for Augmented Reality in 2023 and How it’s Transforming Our World” by Mark M. Whelan
/0 Comments/in Uncategorized /by markmwhelan“The Future is Now: The Case for Augmented Reality in 2023 and How it’s Transforming Our World” by Mark M. Whelan
The Case for Augmented Reality in 202
Augmented reality (AR) glasses are wearable devices that allow users to see and interact with virtual objects and information in the real world. AR glasses have the potential to revolutionize a wide range of industries and applications, both in the consumer and enterprise sectors. Here are a few potential novel use cases for AR glasses:
These are just a few examples of the potential uses for AR glasses in both the consumer and enterprise sectors. As technology continues to advance, it is likely that we will see even more novel and innovative uses for AR glasses in the future.
To learn more about emerging trends by Mark M. Whelan or his artwork.
Visit Future Center Ventures
Or my new book available on Amazon and Apple.
“The Simulation Hypothesis: Are We Living in a Computer Simulation? A Thought-provoking Exploration of the Simulation Argument” by Mark Whelan
/0 Comments/in Uncategorized /by markmwhelan“The Simulation Hypothesis: Are We Living in a Computer Simulation? A Thought-provoking Exploration of the Simulation Argument” by Mark Whelan
The Simulation argument, proposed by philosopher Nick Bostrom in 2003, is a thought experiment that suggests that it is possible that our reality is actually a computer simulation. According to Bostrom, one of the following three statements must be true:
Bostrom’s argument is based on the idea that, as technology advances, it will become increasingly possible to create realistic virtual worlds that are indistinguishable from reality. If a posthuman civilization were to create a large number of ancestor simulations, it is likely that the vast majority of minds that have ever existed would be simulated rather than “real.” In this case, the probability that we are living in a simulated reality would be close to 1.
The Simulation argument has generated a significant amount of discussion and debate within the philosophical and scientific communities. Some argue that the argument relies on certain assumptions that may not be true, such as the assumption that a posthuman civilization would be interested in creating ancestor simulations. Others argue that the argument raises important questions about the nature of reality and the limits of human knowledge.
Overall, the Simulation argument is a thought-provoking idea that challenges our assumptions about the nature of reality and highlights the limits of our understanding of the universe. However, it is important to recognize that the argument is purely speculative and has not been proven to be true or false.
To learn more about emerging trends by Mark M. Whelan or his artwork.
Visit Future Center Ventures
Or my new book available on Amazon and Apple.
“The Quantum Connection: Exploring the Phenomenon of Entanglement and its Impact on Our Understanding of the Universe” by Mark M. Whelan
/0 Comments/in Uncategorized /by markmwhelan“The Quantum Connection: Exploring the Phenomenon of Entanglement and its Impact on Our Understanding of the Universe” by Mark M. Whelan
In quantum mechanics, two particles can become “entangled,” meaning that they exhibit a type of correlation that cannot be explained by classical physics. When two particles are entangled, their properties, such as their spin or polarization, become interconnected, even if the particles are separated by large distances. This phenomenon is known as “non-local” behavior.
To understand how entangled quantum states work, it is helpful to consider an example. Suppose that two particles, called particles A and B, are entangled and separated by a large distance. If the spin of particle A is measured, it will have a certain value, such as “up” or “down.” At the same time, the spin of particle B will also be determined, even though it is not directly measured. In other words, the state of particle A is “linked” to the state of particle B, and measuring one particle instantaneously determines the state of the other particle. This is known as the “instantaneous collapse of the wave function.”
Entangled quantum states are a fundamental concept in quantum mechanics and have a wide range of potential applications, including quantum computing and communication, as well as basic scientific research. However, the concept of entangled quantum states is still not fully understood and continues to be the subject of much research and debate in the scientific community.
To learn more about emerging trends by Mark M. Whelan or his artwork.
Visit Future Center Ventures
Or my new book available on Amazon and Apple.